Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mixpanel (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. I'm assuming the nom wasn't aware this was only closed at the end of September with consensus to keep... Obviously if the nom disagrees they should to go DRV, Also just wanted to point out the nom states "I'm not seeing anything that asserts what it does" yet the lede of the article states "Mixpanel is a business analytics service and company. It tracks user interactions with web and mobile applications and offers tools for targeted communication with them. Its toolset contains in-app A/B tests and user survey forms.[1]" - Anyway AFD is NOTCLEANUP and if anyone disagrees with the closure(s) then they should head to DRV, (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 16:24, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mixpanel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not seeing anything that asserts what it does. The language used seems to be promotional in general. Pyrusca (talk) 20:28, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An Afd on this article was just closed on 27 September 2016 as "KEEP". All seven responses were to keep. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mixpanel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbs527 (talkcontribs) 01:34, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.