Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 July 7
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
July 7
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept as fair use for one article. Diannaa (talk) 23:31, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Derivative of game logo, Not own work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:30, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wordmark-academic1.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is a logo, It's certainly not GPL. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:27, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept. Diannaa (talk) 23:38, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Yaheh Hallegua.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- doubtful this was entirely own work of now banned user User:TreasuryTag. 24.151.116.25 (talk) 16:46, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I took this photo myself with my own camera. No clear reason has been provided as to why this is in doubt? ╟─TreasuryTag►Woolsack─╢ 16:50, 7 July 2013 (UTC) (copied by request (✉→BWilkins←✎) 16:58, 7 July 2013 (UTC))[reply]
- A few points. Normally at commons we would not delete this image an assume good faith of the uploader. The reasons being that it contains exif data from the original camera, it is not published on the web as a higher quality version, etc. We also may wish to move this review to the uploaders talk page to save relaying of messages. TreasuryTag, I know it is an older file but is there an uncropped version still around with the exif data as well? That may help. I would say keep as it is but others may wish to see more evidence.--Canoe1967 (talk) 18:49, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Given that TreasuryTag was one of the most ardent defenders of our copyright policies, I see no reason to doubt his claim. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:57, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.